Discussion Question

After hearing about the Vietnamese women who felt underrepresented while teaching TTTC because of the lack of Vietnamese characters in the book I thought that she was a little harsh on the author. I did not think it was fair of her to assume that a book meant to carry on the legacy of the author’s dead platoon mates needed to represent the Vietnamese people in good light. The purpose of the book was not to show how the people of Vietnam helped the Americans or how the war affected them, no this was a book written to immortalize O’Brien’s experiences in Vietnam along with making sure his dead friends were never truly dead by having their story continuously read and told so they are never forgotten. I do understand where she is coming from saying it is unfair to have to teach and listen to her colleagues talk about a book that makes her people seem like enemies. While her thoughts are fair, I do not think it was right of her to say that the book was making her uncomfortable literature is supposed to make you feel and test the limits of comfort so that you may learn more about another person’s perspective. In my opinion, she did the right thing by selecting a book to teach alongside it, but it was not very respectful to say O’Brien’s work did not represent her culture when it never intended to.

Comments

  1. Tate TaczakDecember 6, 2018 at 6:25 AM

    Nick, I really enjoyed reading you opinions regarding the article we read in class. It truly is a complex topic, since it is entirely understandable to feel offended by the book as you mentioned. Personally, while I do agree that this book is not meant to represent her culture, I also believe that she should have had the opportunity to alter her schedule (or minimally discuss the issue with her peers) to better reflect the whole story. I believe students should be shown the entire story before being introduced to a potentially biased view, regardless of the intentions of the writer.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Read Shakespeare

1. According to the article, what are some reasons that students find Shakespeare difficult to understand? What does Mack present as an answer to this? Many students find Shakespeare difficult to read because of the language he uses in his works. Not much of his pieces are straight forward and written in a context similar to today’s writing style with the old English turning many students away from Shakespeare. The best way to understand Shakespeare and enjoy what you are reading is by reading it over and over again. You will pick up on new things with each go through and learn to appreciate the work more and more and find what it has to offer. 2. According to Mack, when you finally “get” Shakespeare, what do you actually get? When you finally get Shakespeare, you understand yourself and the world you in live in. 3. List and summarize five convincing arguments in answer to the question “Why read Shakespeare?” A Time for Developing Interests  By reading these work
Read more

Ophelia Advice

I found Laertes’ and Polonius’ advice to Ophelia to be a little blunt and aggressive. They treat her like she has no wits about her and has no clue what is going on around her. It is a bit condescending both of their tones towards her treating her more like an object then someone they actually care for making sure she doesn’t do anything stupid to shame the family name. Though it is necessary for them to warn her of Hamlet because he very well will break her heart as it is impossible for him to marry her. Hamlet has no choice who he marries as he is royalty and needs to do what is best for the crown and it is very unlikely Ophelia is good for crown. In short, the warning of Hamlet was needed but they did it in such a way that it seemed mean and degrading for Ophelia.
Read more

The Terrorist, He Watches

  Wislawa Syzmborska poem The Terrorist, He Watches takes a modern look on war poetry. Syzmborska uses the modern battlefield of cities and public places and the enemy of today, those who wish to disrupt peace through radical acts of violence. One of the big questions of the poem is who is speaking.     Based on the title of the poem The Terrorist, He Watches the speaker can be two people. They can either be the terrorist himself watching over what he is about to bomb or a bystander watching as the terrorist sets up his evil act. While reading the poem, I leaned more towards the speaker being a bystander because of a single line in particular “The terrorist's already on the other side.” This line makes it appear as though someone is watching the scene unfold and has located the terrorist and is telling the reader where they are. This would make the most sense in the feel of the poem as to why would the terrorist be so concerned about who walks in and out of the bar.     The seco
Read more